Other blogs その他のブログ

Mari Takenouchi (Blogger, translator, journalist) Email: mariscontact@gmail.com  
Mari Takenouchi Files 竹野内真理ファイルhttp://takenouchimari.blogspot.jp/
真理の公開質問Mari Takenouchi's Open Letters http://koukaishitsumon.blogspot.jp
Videos of Dr. Bandazhevsky and I バンダジェフスキーと真理の動画 https://maritakenouchiyoutube.blogspot.com/
Shady people http://fukushimaworkerslist.blogspot.jp/ Mari's essay http://takenouchimariessay.blogspot.jp/
Dr. Bandazhevsky's research paper (English and Japanese) https://bandazhevskypaper.blogspot.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mariscontact/
Twitter: @SaveKidsJapan2 (new one but very few followers!) @mariscontact (used to be popular, but I cannot log in anymore!)


川内原発が危険!手遅れになる前に・・Sendai NPP in danger! Before it gets too late...

Mari Takenouchi explainig the danger at Sendai Nuclear Power Plant and other nuclear plants in Japan


Sendai Nuclear Power Plant is to be restarted by the decision of Japanese government, which could be called as a historical decision that ignores the future lives of the people.


Sendai is to be restarted in 2015, but as I wrote in Question 3, it has numerous faults and there was even a whistle blower who confesssed that many changed the sample of boring cores of the site.  (The ground of Sendai NPP is not solid enough so many people exchanged the samples to go ahead with the construction.)


Former professor of Wako University, Mr. Sunao Ogose, a geologist who pointed out this issue, was later criminally accused by a member of Liberal Democratic Party.


I received a letter from Mr. Ogose who is over 90 years old now on November 17, 2014.


Mr. Ogose is deploring the fact that Sendai NPP is to be restarted without these important facts known widely...He also deplores the insufficient effort by anti-nuclear groups!


Dear all, please disseminate the article below!



Sendai Nuclear Power Plant issue is covered in the following of my blog.




Former professor of Wako University, Mr. Sunao Ogose was also criminally accused for revealing the facts of Sendai Nuclear Power Plant scandal (intentious exchange of boring core samples) ! 

 Mr. Sunao Ogose, anti-nuke geologist
He predicted Great Hanshin Earthquake (1995) and supported a lawsuit against the construction of Rokko Liner in Kobe before the earthquake.  He also predicted Niigata-Oki Earthquake which brought more than 3000 damages to Kashiwazaki Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant.  In 1970s, he gave a warning to Sendai Nuclear Power Plant, which is now decided to be restarted by the government.

Extract and Summary of Mr. Ogose's work, "Document on Development and Pollution Studies, Vol IV" (1982)

Exchange of Boring Core Samples of Sendai Nuclear Power Plant Before the Construction!



"Wierd...so strange...See?  This easily breaks off like this.  The ground here has countless faults and cracks vertically and horizontally like a wooden mosaic work.  The layer here is the same layer as the ground rock foundation of the Sendai nuclear power plant.  However, Kyushu Electric Company talks as if there is no problem..."

This was the word of  a geologist, Mr. Sunao Ogose who was invited to investigate the foundation of Sendai Nuclear Power Plant on December 13, 1975.


Then on the very same day, Mr. Kimio Nakano (farmer in Sendai City, Yoseda Town) exposed that HE HAD EXCHANGED THE BORING CORE SAMPLE OF SENDAI NPP for the subcontractor of Kyushu Electric Company! 


On the following day, the residents held a press conference and this became a major news in local papers.  Kyushu Electric Company tried to deny the fact, but Mr. Nakano refuted as, "I did it and others did it.  As a proof, I polished a left-over borig core and put it as a decorative ornament in my living room."


This issue was discussed in the Committee of Scientific Promotion Measures in the Upper House on November 21, 1977, but Kyushu Electric Company and Tatsuo Yamazaki, a professor of Kyushu University, deluded this serious fact saying, "Even though there was some exchange, there would have been no impact on the decision of NPP construction."


Mr. Ogose Criminally Accused by a Local Right Winger



Regarding the above fact of the whistle blower, I explained I could geologically give proof of the boring core exchange.

Then a local right winger called Mr. Shozo Inoue (so called Fukuda Faction of LDP member) criminally accused me for infringement of trust and obstruction of business against Kyushu Electric Company through the Supreme Prosecutors' Office.

Letter of accusation dated on January 29th, 1976 was filed in Supreme Prosecutors' Office and was forwarded to Tokyo Local Prosecutors' Office, and I was investigated by the prosecutors for 3 times.
(Note: Takenouchi was also criminally accused by ETHOS on the same day of 2014!)


However, I was not disseminating something untrue or infringed the trust of Kyushu Electric intentionally or obstructed its business.

Moreover, the exchange of boring core is an irrefutable fact which was also revealed in the Upper House, so the accusation by Mr. Shozo Inoue was not successful.



However, Mr. Inoue was disseminating the following as contrary to the fact,
"Mr. Ogose explained to the prosecutor that the core exchange was not a fact and admitted that his action was excessive and he had no intention to fight legally with Mr. Inoue."

Furthermore, Mr. Inoue was slandering Mr. Ogose saying, "He is a demagogue scholar who is working for a nameless private university."


Mr. Inoue was also actively involved in election campaign supporting for LDP candidate, but he has the records of arrest and accusation for violating the Election Law. 

He is also dubbed as "The Accuser" since he was known for accusing inconvenient people for LDP with various reasons.  A famous anti-nuclear lecturer, Mr. Sanshiro Kume was also criminally accused by Mr. Inoue.

Crime of Government Sided Scholar: A Professor Emeritus of Tokyo Univeristy Who Tried to Put Crime of Homicide on an Innocent Citizen


Behind the cause of "Seeking for the truth,"pretending that they had been studying for their expertise, there are many scholars who can be just regarded as puppet of the state power sacrificing the truth of the very expertise. 

It has been revealed that there are MANY examples where these scholars sacrifice honest residents and citizens who are struggling for anti-development/pullution/harmful drugs.

In this regard, there is no other way than pursuing the untruth of government-puppet scholars in the struggle of anti-nuclear/pullution/harmful drugs.


I need to emphasize here that especially in 1st grade state-owned universities, there are many government-puppet evil scholars who would even give helping hands to the police and judicial power, driving innocent citizens into false crimes.


The late Mr. Tanemoto Furuhata, a Tokyo Univeristy Professor Emeritus who used to be the dicrector of Science Police Institute is known to be the most evil one until today. 

Having involved in the investigation and scientific judgement on the side of police and the prosecutor in the case of Hirosaki, Shimada, Zaidagawa (they were revealed as false accusation after all), Mr. Furuhata lied that there were evidence of crimes so that innocent citizens were accused as murderers.


Including the Sendai NPP issue, I gave 3 questions to Ministry of Justice.  On August1, there was an answer from Ministry of Justice saying that they cannot answer the questions.






Please take a look at the 3 very important questions.

1. 福島原発事故を起こした東電幹部や国の責任者などへは、住民が刑事告訴を起こしたにもかかわらず、警察も検察も捜査さえされませんでした。ところが事故前から地震と原発の問題を憂慮してIAEAに単独直訴まで行い、事故後は「福島の子供たちに多数の甲状腺がんや白血病など健康被害が出ているので疎開させよ、エートスは人体実験である」とツイッターで訴えたシングルマザーの私の所には、沖縄まで福島から警察と検察が沖縄まで来て捜査を行い、起訴猶予となりました。海外のメディアもこれを驚くべきニュースとして取り上げています。不公平な司法措置ではないですか?

1. There was no investigation by police/prosecutor on TEPCO executives in spite of criminal accusation by residents.  However, as for me, a single mother who had visited IAEA regarding nuclear and earthquake issue before the Fukushima accident, and called for evacuation of kids saying through twitter, "health hazards such as many thyroid cancer or even leukemia are observed.  ETHOS is a human experiment" was actually investigated by Fukushima police and prosecutor who came all the way to Okinawa.  I eventually got deferred indictment and foreign media took up this case as a shoking news.  Isn't this an unfair judicial treatment?

2. 1996年に起きたもんじゅ西村事件(動燃のナトリウム漏れ事故調査社内担当の西村成生氏が自殺、それを境にマスコミが事故の報道から離れた事件)では、X線写真や医療カルテ、深部体温の記録などより、飛び降り自殺ではなく、他殺であると検死をしたした医師その他の法医学者がご遺族に見解を話しています。ところが担当弁護士の海渡雄一氏は最も大事な自殺・他殺の争点を無視し、刑事事件としてではなく民事事件として扱い、また警察に問い合わせても「弁護士がそのような対応であれば、警察は絶対に動かない」と言います。このような扱いはあり得ないのではないですか?再捜査すべきではないですか

2. In 1996, Monju Nishimura Case took place, in which Mr. Shigeo Nishimura, in-house investigator of Monju Fast Breeder Reactor accident comitted a suicide.  However, X-ray photoes and medical records showed that he did not jump off from the building and instead was killed, which was testified by the doctor in charge along with other forensic doctors.  Surprizingly, the lawyer who was in charge of this incident took the case as civil case in stead of a criminal case, ignoring the high possibility of homicide.  The police says that they would not make any move if the lawyer acted that way.  I am quite shocked at the treatment of this case.  Isn't it necessary to reinvestigate this case?

3. 40年来の反原発の反骨の地質学者であり、1975年12月川内原発建設前に調査に入った元和光大学教授、生越忠氏は、予定地と連なる地層の中に多くの断層や節理を見つけ、原発建設の地盤として不適切であることを指摘したところ、地元の農家の人がボーリングコアをより強度な地層の土とすり替えていたことを内部告発。この件を発表した後、1976年右翼の人物から九州電力への名誉棄損と営業妨害の容疑で刑事告訴され、最高検察庁が受理、その後東京地検に回され、結局は不起訴となったが、生越氏は3度にわたり取り調べを受けたと言います。本来であれば、九州電力が告発されるべき事件であり、反原発の憂慮する住民や学者に対する嫌がらせとしてか思えず、非常に不当な司法措置と考えますが、どうですか?また川内原発が最も再稼働に近いと言われている現在、この事件を再検証する必要があるのではないですか?

3. In December 1975, former Wako University professor Sunao Ogose made a research on the soil of Sendai Nuclear Power Plant premise, and found out countless number of faults and cracks in the same layer of soil, which showed inappropriateness of building a nuclear power plant in that site.  Then a local farmer who worked at the boring core site confessed that he switched the core with firmer soil. After Mr. Ogose announced this whistle blower's statement, he was criminally accused by a LDP related right winger and the Supreme Prosecutors' Office took up the case.  Then the case was taken by Tokyo prosecutors' office and Mr. Ogose was investigated for 3 times and eventully non-indicted.  To begin with, Kyushu Electric Company who ordered switching the cores should be the one to be criminlly accused and what had happened seems to be harassement against anti-nuclear residents and scholars.  Sendai Nuclear power plant is said to be the one which is closest to the restart.  Isn't it necessary to reinvestigate this case?




  • 現地調査に臨んだところ、川内原発の原子炉設置予定地の地盤は、断層や節理でずたずたに切られた、傷だらけのもの

  • 1965年にこの地域一帯の地質調査をした鹿児島県が、地盤を安定したものと見せかけるため、中生層を古期岩層に塗り替え

  • 川内川筋に存在すると推定されていた大断層を抹殺

  • 九電の下請け業者がボーリング・コアの差し替えという恐るべき行為を続けていたことが、内部告発によってわかった。「私や他の作業員、現場監督などが、何回もコアを差し換えた。差し替えは公然と行われていた」

  • ところがボーリングコア差し替え事件を、九州大学生産科学研究所の山崎達雄教授がごまかしてしまった!)

  • 当時、鹿児島大学理学部地学科の露木利貞教授に公開質問するも、露木教授は逃げ回った。



  • 鹿児島の中心街は川内原発からたった44km
  • 現地調査を建設前の1975年に行った生越氏は、 敷地の一部および周辺の平山溶岩に顕著な断層粘土を伴った大規模活断層ありと主張したが、九電は無視。
  • 川内原発の敷地の一部を含む南九州地方の新第三世紀末ないし第四紀古期の火山岩類に断層で切られている部分があることは、以前から公知の事実で文献も発行されている。ところが、これも九電も国も無視。
  • 1979年の着工前であった、1977年、村山喜一衆議院議員からの質問に、国は断層の存在は認めつつも、問題にならないと国会答弁。
  • 1997年、2回にわたり「鹿児島県北西部の地震」が発生。一回目はM=6.5(深さ12km)で震度5強、二回目はM=6.3(深さ9km)で震度は6弱。 →それでも川内原発は止まらなかった!(より地震規模が大きく、震央距離が川内原発に近く、震源深さがより浅ければ、重大事故が起きていた可能性。)
  • 1997年地震は、プレート間地震でもなく、海洋プレート内地震でもなく、大陸プレート内の潜在活断層の再活動によっておこった活断層地震であることは確か。
  • ところが、97年の地震では活断層もリニアメントも見られなかった。つまり同地域には潜在的に断層が存在。
  • ただし、上記活断層はボーリング調査(せいぜい深さ3km)で分かる範囲ではない。九電は「活断層の存在がわかっていない」というべきところを、「活断層は存在していないことが分かった」とすり替えた。
  • 1997年地震の後に、非常に余震が多かった。(断層や節理が多い地層なので、蓄積されていたひずみエネルギーが一挙に放出されなかった可能性)
  • 中央構造線が川内原発の敷地の西を通っているので、延岡ー紫尾山構造線の南方延長部が、もし、川内川河口の左岸付近にまで及んでいるとすると、その位置は、中央構造線の東、つまり川内原発の敷地内または近傍になり、内陸直下型の大陸プレート内地震が発生する可能が多分にある。
  • すべての原発に言えることだが、原発の支持基盤が地震断層の出現によって変位・変形することがあり得るのに、これを原発の耐震設計では考慮していない。
  • 建築物の固有周期と支持基盤の固有周期が似通っていて共振現象を起こすと、より大きな被害をこうむる。剛性の強い原子炉施設は、震央距離が短い大陸プレート内地震が起こった場合に共振現象を引き起こす恐れがある。
  • 1978年9月29日、活断層の定義を50万年前以降に動いたものから5万年前以降にしてしまった。(現在は40万年前以降)
  • 施設の基礎岩盤に変位・変形が生じた場合は、たとえ施設をいかほど頑丈に作ったとしても、被害の発生が防止できなくなる恐れがある。原発は、基礎岩盤が破壊されることはないという誤った前提に立っている。
  • 九電は海洋プレート内地震を全く無視している。1909年の宮崎県西部の地震はM=7.6、深さ約150kmのユーラシアプレートとその下に沈み込んでいるフィリピン海プレート内の地震。震央位置は、宮崎・熊本両県境にある市房山付近で、川内原発に近い延岡ー紫尾山構造線が走っている。
  • 海洋プレート内地震には、プレート間地震とほぼ同一の巨大地震もある。例:1911年喜界島近海の地震(M=8.0、深さ=100キロメートル)、1993年釧路沖地震(M=7.8、深さ101km)、1994年北海道東方沖地震(M=8.1、深さ23km)
  • 特に上記の海洋プレート内地震である、喜界島近海の地震では、震央位置がより北方で発生する可能性もあるのであり、その場合は川内原発の敷地の直下で、見かけ上は「内陸直下型地震」の形をとった海洋プレート内地震が発生することも皆無ではない。(ただし、電力会社は海洋プレート内地震を検討していない)
  • 地震が今まで起こっていないとされていた空白域でM=7.5を超える大地震、もしくはM=8.0前後という巨大地震が起こった例はある。
  • 川内原発に関しては、大地震の空白域であること、97年の中地震で活断層が存在することが明らかになったこと、そして九州電力が国内で最低基準の地震動を川内原発に適用してしまったことで、地震による危険度は高いと言える。